Red in the face: Approach to diagnosis of red rashes on the face.

BACKGROUND: A red rash on the face in an adult patient is a common presentation to general practice in Australia. Rashes on the face significantly affect quality of life because this is a cosmetically sensitive site. Ascertaining the correct diagnosis is therefore of utmost importance so that appropriate treatment can be initiated. OBJECTIVE: This article discusses the assessment of red rashes on the face in an adult patient. DISCUSSION: Diagnosing a red rash on the face requires assessment of symptomology, age of onset, rash morphology and 'clinical clues' that help delineate between differentials. Although the list of differential diagnoses is wide, many of the common diagnoses can be made clinically without the need for investigations. Investigations such as skin biopsy are useful if the diagnosis is unclear, if the rash is not responding to initial treatment and/or a referral to a dermatologist is being considered.

Approach to red, scaly eruptions in the older patient.

BACKGROUND: Older patients with a red scaly eruption often present first to a primary care practitioner. A thorough clinical assessment can help delineate between common causes and assist the clinician with the next steps in management. OBJECTIVE: This article discusses the assessment of acute- to subacute-onset erythematous and scaly plaques that are present on multiple body sites in a patient aged >65 years. DISCUSSION: The differential diagnosis of a red, scaly rash in an older patient includes atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, generalised drug eruption, tinea, scabies and non-bullous pemphigoid. Less common causes include subacute cutaneous lupus and mycosis fungoides. If the diagnosis is unclear after clinical assessment, a skin biopsy sent for histopathology, and/or direct immunofluorescence can be very useful. Management requires consideration of physical impairments, carer availability and cost.

Think before you shave: Factors influencing choice of biopsy technique for invasive melanoma and effect on definitive management.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Partial biopsies are sometimes used for melanoma diagnosis with anticipated time and cost savings compared to excisional biopsy. However, their impact on subsequent melanoma management is unknown. Determine factors related to choice of partial over excisional biopsy to diagnose invasive melanoma and examine the effect of partial biopsies on definitive melanoma management. METHOD: Retrospective repeated cross-sectional population-based study through the Victorian Cancer Registry of diagnosed melanomas in 2005, 2010 and 2015. A random sample of 400 patients per year, stratified by tumour thickness, was selected. RESULTS: A total of 1200 patients had 833 excisional and 337 partial biopsies. Omission of suspected diagnosis on pathology requests affected 46% (532/1151) of all diagnostic biopsies. Diagnostic suspicion did not influence preference for partial over excisional biopsy [Odds Ratio (OR) 1.2, 95%CI 0.8-1.7; P = 0.40]. The partial:excisional biopsy usage ratio was higher in patients aged > 50 years than patients aged <50 years [relative risk ratios (RRR) 1.5; 95%CI 1.0 to 2.2; P = 0.03]. In 34% and 17% of tumours diagnosed with punch and shave, respectively, three procedures were required for definitive excision instead of two, compared with 5% of excisional biopsies When partial biopsy was used, patients were at greater risk of requiring three-staged excisions when controlled for age, anatomical site, melanoma subtype and thickness (RRR 6.7; 95%CI 4.4-10.1; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Diagnostic suspicion does not appear to be a major factor influencing choice of biopsy technique. Using partial biopsy to diagnose melanoma often leads to an extra procedure for definitive treatment compared with excisional biopsy.